Rolex Submariner vs Omega Diver 300M 42 mm
Side-by-side dimension comparison — Ref. 124060 vs Ref. 210.30.42.20.01.001
Dimensions Compared
| Spec | Rolex Submariner | Omega Diver 300M 42 mm |
|---|---|---|
| Diameter | 41.0 mm | 42.0 mm |
| Lug-to-Lug | 47.5 mm | 49.9 mm |
| Thickness | 12.2 mm | 13.6 mm |
| Lug Width | 20 mm | 20 mm |
| Weight | 155 g | 194 g |
| Material | Oystersteel (904L) | Stainless Steel |
| Water Resistance | 300 m | 300 m |
| Movement | Automatic | Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 70 hours | 55 hours |
| MSRP | $9,100 | $6,700 |
Verdict
The Omega Diver 300M 42 mm is 1.0 mm wider at 42.0 mm versus 41.0 mm, giving it a slightly larger wrist presence. The Rolex Submariner has a shorter lug-to-lug distance, making it better suited for smaller wrists. The Rolex Submariner wears thinner at 12.2 mm versus 13.6 mm, sitting closer to the wrist. At retail, the Omega Diver 300M 42 mm is the more accessible option at $6,700 versus $9,100.
Where to Buy
Links may be affiliate links. See our affiliate disclosure.